<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tigers sneak in Robertson extension</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dtownbaseball.com/2008/01/16/tigers-sneak-in-robertson-extension/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dtownbaseball.com/2008/01/16/tigers-sneak-in-robertson-extension/</link>
	<description>A Detroit Tiger Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:13:06 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.dtownbaseball.com/2008/01/16/tigers-sneak-in-robertson-extension/comment-page-1/#comment-8759</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dtownbaseball.com/2008/01/16/tigers-sneak-in-robertson-extension/#comment-8759</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d take Robertson over Silva, certainly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d take Robertson over Silva, certainly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rea</title>
		<link>http://www.dtownbaseball.com/2008/01/16/tigers-sneak-in-robertson-extension/comment-page-1/#comment-8758</link>
		<dc:creator>rea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dtownbaseball.com/2008/01/16/tigers-sneak-in-robertson-extension/#comment-8758</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I can only assume that Detroit wanted these stipulations in-case last yearâ€™s â€˜tired armâ€˜ turns out to be more than it was, but that isnâ€™t much of a savings.&lt;/i&gt;

Well, but of course, he&#039;s also not likely to get 200/400 innings if he stinks, &#039;tired arm&#039; or not.

I&#039;d rather have Robertson that Silva, to whom the Mariners just gave a rather bigger contract . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I can only assume that Detroit wanted these stipulations in-case last yearâ€™s â€˜tired armâ€˜ turns out to be more than it was, but that isnâ€™t much of a savings.</i></p>
<p>Well, but of course, he&#8217;s also not likely to get 200/400 innings if he stinks, &#8216;tired arm&#8217; or not.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d rather have Robertson that Silva, to whom the Mariners just gave a rather bigger contract . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.dtownbaseball.com/2008/01/16/tigers-sneak-in-robertson-extension/comment-page-1/#comment-8751</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dtownbaseball.com/2008/01/16/tigers-sneak-in-robertson-extension/#comment-8751</guid>
		<description>I think that they believe that he would have gotten near as much, at least this year and next, or more in arbitration. It&#039;s possible. 

I do like Nate though and hope to see him eat up innings just a bit better next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that they believe that he would have gotten near as much, at least this year and next, or more in arbitration. It&#8217;s possible. </p>
<p>I do like Nate though and hope to see him eat up innings just a bit better next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://www.dtownbaseball.com/2008/01/16/tigers-sneak-in-robertson-extension/comment-page-1/#comment-8750</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dtownbaseball.com/2008/01/16/tigers-sneak-in-robertson-extension/#comment-8750</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t you think it would have made more sense to keep him through 2009, as they could have, and then think about a long term extension?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t you think it would have made more sense to keep him through 2009, as they could have, and then think about a long term extension?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
