<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wil Ledezma trade isn&#8217;t exactly a wash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dtownbaseball.com/2007/06/23/wil-ledezma-trade-isnt-exactly-a-wash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dtownbaseball.com/2007/06/23/wil-ledezma-trade-isnt-exactly-a-wash/</link>
	<description>A Detroit Tiger Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:11:16 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.dtownbaseball.com/2007/06/23/wil-ledezma-trade-isnt-exactly-a-wash/comment-page-1/#comment-4858</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 02:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dtownbaseball.com/2007/06/23/wil-ledezma-trade-isnt-exactly-a-wash/#comment-4858</guid>
		<description>I guess it comes down to my seeing Ledezma&#039;s potential as filling a starting slot as being worth more than a reliever. McBride is good but not great. 

Ledezma has some good pitches as well. Kyle Sleeth was a first round pick as well :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess it comes down to my seeing Ledezma&#8217;s potential as filling a starting slot as being worth more than a reliever. McBride is good but not great. </p>
<p>Ledezma has some good pitches as well. Kyle Sleeth was a first round pick as well :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.dtownbaseball.com/2007/06/23/wil-ledezma-trade-isnt-exactly-a-wash/comment-page-1/#comment-4776</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 22:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dtownbaseball.com/2007/06/23/wil-ledezma-trade-isnt-exactly-a-wash/#comment-4776</guid>
		<description>I have to disagree as well.  I have two favorite teams, the Tigers and Braves.  So I have seen alot of McBride.  He has a very good breaking ball, and there were times he was the best reliever the Braves had. Ledezma has a better chance of fulfilling his potential in the NL, and it wouldn&#039;t surprise me to see him in Atlanta&#039;s rotation by the end of the year.  Seay and Byrdak are barely useable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree as well.  I have two favorite teams, the Tigers and Braves.  So I have seen alot of McBride.  He has a very good breaking ball, and there were times he was the best reliever the Braves had. Ledezma has a better chance of fulfilling his potential in the NL, and it wouldn&#8217;t surprise me to see him in Atlanta&#8217;s rotation by the end of the year.  Seay and Byrdak are barely useable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.dtownbaseball.com/2007/06/23/wil-ledezma-trade-isnt-exactly-a-wash/comment-page-1/#comment-4773</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 19:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dtownbaseball.com/2007/06/23/wil-ledezma-trade-isnt-exactly-a-wash/#comment-4773</guid>
		<description>I disagree. McBride has outstanding minor league numbers, is a former 1st round pick, and I think may be an upgrade over Ledezma.

Ledezma has outstanding stuff, no one can deny that. But, his command to theis point in his career has been suspect at best.

-Sam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree. McBride has outstanding minor league numbers, is a former 1st round pick, and I think may be an upgrade over Ledezma.</p>
<p>Ledezma has outstanding stuff, no one can deny that. But, his command to theis point in his career has been suspect at best.</p>
<p>-Sam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.dtownbaseball.com/2007/06/23/wil-ledezma-trade-isnt-exactly-a-wash/comment-page-1/#comment-4762</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 01:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dtownbaseball.com/2007/06/23/wil-ledezma-trade-isnt-exactly-a-wash/#comment-4762</guid>
		<description>Kurt, Your right and in reality, if no team has anyone to give and you absolutely need to open a roster spot then you are at everyone elses mercy.

I held out hope for Ledezma and though he could be worth more to others since he is a viable starter as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kurt, Your right and in reality, if no team has anyone to give and you absolutely need to open a roster spot then you are at everyone elses mercy.</p>
<p>I held out hope for Ledezma and though he could be worth more to others since he is a viable starter as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bunt Singles June 24: Debating &#187; Mack Avenue Tigers : A Detroit Tigers Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.dtownbaseball.com/2007/06/23/wil-ledezma-trade-isnt-exactly-a-wash/comment-page-1/#comment-4758</link>
		<dc:creator>Bunt Singles June 24: Debating &#187; Mack Avenue Tigers : A Detroit Tigers Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 22:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dtownbaseball.com/2007/06/23/wil-ledezma-trade-isnt-exactly-a-wash/#comment-4758</guid>
		<description>[...] Eric didn&#8217;t think Dombrowski got proper value for Wil Ledezma (DTown Baseball) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Eric didn&#8217;t think Dombrowski got proper value for Wil Ledezma (DTown Baseball) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Detroit Tiger Weblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2007-06-24</title>
		<link>http://www.dtownbaseball.com/2007/06/23/wil-ledezma-trade-isnt-exactly-a-wash/comment-page-1/#comment-4756</link>
		<dc:creator>The Detroit Tiger Weblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2007-06-24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 17:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dtownbaseball.com/2007/06/23/wil-ledezma-trade-isnt-exactly-a-wash/#comment-4756</guid>
		<description>[...] D-Town Baseball - A Detroit Tigers Blog Â» Wil Ledezma trade isnâ€™t exactly a wash A detailed look comparing Ledezma and Macay McBride [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] D-Town Baseball &#8211; A Detroit Tigers Blog Â» Wil Ledezma trade isnâ€™t exactly a wash A detailed look comparing Ledezma and Macay McBride [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt</title>
		<link>http://www.dtownbaseball.com/2007/06/23/wil-ledezma-trade-isnt-exactly-a-wash/comment-page-1/#comment-4723</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 20:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dtownbaseball.com/2007/06/23/wil-ledezma-trade-isnt-exactly-a-wash/#comment-4723</guid>
		<description>I just think it was a case of not having any place to put Ledezma. I was a bit surprised Dombrowski got so little in return, but carrying Ledezma was not really helping matters either. At least they don&#039;t have to carry McBride. Still, I&#039;d have liked to see a better return.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just think it was a case of not having any place to put Ledezma. I was a bit surprised Dombrowski got so little in return, but carrying Ledezma was not really helping matters either. At least they don&#8217;t have to carry McBride. Still, I&#8217;d have liked to see a better return.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
